Welcome to Skin cancer and Mesothelioma Cancer

Mesothelioma Cancer, Melanoma Cancer, Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma Lawyer
==================================================================

Monday, July 28, 2008

Fwd: Association between plasma cholesterol and prostate cancer in the PSA era.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:29 AM
Subject: Association between plasma cholesterol and prostate cancer in the PSA era.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]Int J Cancer. 2008 Jul 21;
Platz EA, Clinton SK, Giovannucci E

We previously found that statin users had a lower risk of advanced and possibly high-grade prostate cancer compared with nonusers. We hypothesize that statins' effects on cholesterol synthesis may explain those findings because prostate cancer cells exhibit cholesterol dysregulation. Thus, we investigated whether low plasma cholesterol is associated with prostate cancer overall and by stage and grade. Participants were drawn from the 18,018 members of the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study who provided blood in 1993-1995. We ascertained 698 incident cases through January 2000. Controls were 698 men who had a PSA test and were matched to cases. Plasma cholesterol was measured enzymatically. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate multivariable ORs and 95% CIs of total, clinically organ-confined (n = 518), advanced (T3b or worse; n = 61), low-grade (Gleason sum /= 7, n = 247) disease. Low cholesterol (/=25th percentile) was not associated with total (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.72-1.20), organ-confined (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64-1.18) or low-grade (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.75-1.51) disease. However, men with low cholesterol had a lower risk of high-grade disease (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.98), especially if organ-confined (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29-0.99). The association for advanced disease appeared inverse, but number of cases was small (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.13-1.36). Associations remained after excluding cholesterol-lowering drug users. These results coupled with prior statin findings suggest that mechanistic studies on cholesterol metabolism should be pursued to understand a possible target for preventing poorly differentiated prostate cancers. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18646186
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc

 http://www.jgvfinance.com/
 

 

Fwd: Oral maxillofacial neoplasms in an East African population a 10 year retrospective study of 1863 cases using histopathological reports.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:44 PM
Subject: Oral maxillofacial neoplasms in an East African population a 10 year retrospective study of 1863 cases using histopathological reports.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]BMC Oral Health. 2008 Jul 23; 8(1): 19
Kamulegeya A, Kalyanyama B

ABSTRACT: Introduction and objective Neoplasms of the oral maxillofacial area are an interesting entity characterized by differences in nomenclature and classification at different centers. We report neoplastic diagnoses seen at the departments of oral maxillofacial surgery of Muhimbili and Mulago referral hospitals in Tanzania and Uganda respectively over a 10 year period. METHODS: We retrieved histopathological reports archived at the departments of oral maxillofacial surgery of Muhimbili and Mulago referral hospitals in Tanzania and Uganda respectively over a 10 year period from June 1989-July 1999. RESULTS: In the period between June 1989 and July 1999, 565 and 1298 neoplastic oro-facial cases were retrieved of which 284 (50.53%) and 967 (74.54%) were malignant neoplasms at Muhimbili and Mulago hospitals respectively. Overall 67.28% of the diagnoses recorded were malignant with Kaposi's sarcoma (21.98%), Burkiits lymphoma (20.45%), and squamous cell carcinoma (15.22%) dominating that group while ameloblastoma (9.23%), fibromas (7.3%) and pleomorphic adenoma (4.95%) dominated the benign group. The high frequency of malignancies could be due to inclusion criteria and the clinical practice of selective histopathology investigation. However, it may also be due to higher chances of referrals in case of malignancies. CONCLUSION: There is need to reexamine the slides in these two centers in order to bring them in line with the most recent WHO classification so as to allow for comparison with reports from else where.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18651958
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc