---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - breast cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Disparities in Urban and Rural Mastectomy Populations : The Effects of Patient- and County-Level Factors on Likelihood of Receipt of Mastectomy.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com
[1]Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul 29;
Jacobs LK, Kelley KA, Rosson GD, Detrani ME, Chang DC
BACKGROUND: Using the 2006 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the 2004 Area Resource File (ARF), the likelihood of mastectomy for stages I-III breast cancer patients in urban versus rural populations are examined. County and patient level data are evaluated for impact on receipt of mastectomy. Patient variables included age, stage, race, and marital status, and community variables are income, employment, and radiation facility staff density. The likelihood of mastectomy in urban and rural patients, and the impact of the different variables on that procedure, is reported. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a combined dataset from the 2006 SEER database and the 2004 ARF linked using the federal information processing standard (FIPS) state county variable evaluates patient and county variables with multivariate regression. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2003, 137,303 patients were identified in the SEER database. The rural population (county population of
___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18663535
--
~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc
From: HubMed - breast cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Disparities in Urban and Rural Mastectomy Populations : The Effects of Patient- and County-Level Factors on Likelihood of Receipt of Mastectomy.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com
[1]Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul 29;
Jacobs LK, Kelley KA, Rosson GD, Detrani ME, Chang DC
BACKGROUND: Using the 2006 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the 2004 Area Resource File (ARF), the likelihood of mastectomy for stages I-III breast cancer patients in urban versus rural populations are examined. County and patient level data are evaluated for impact on receipt of mastectomy. Patient variables included age, stage, race, and marital status, and community variables are income, employment, and radiation facility staff density. The likelihood of mastectomy in urban and rural patients, and the impact of the different variables on that procedure, is reported. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a combined dataset from the 2006 SEER database and the 2004 ARF linked using the federal information processing standard (FIPS) state county variable evaluates patient and county variables with multivariate regression. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2003, 137,303 patients were identified in the SEER database. The rural population (county population of
___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18663535
--
~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc